Updated: 5/16/2006; 2:09:04 PM.

Current events
Post-9-11 events and analyses


daily link  Thursday, January 29, 2004


2001 Budgets of Top 20 Think Tanks: In $m:

Organization
Actual Expenses
Rand Corporation
$ 169.0
Urban Institute
64.5
Heritage Foundation
33.5
Hoover Institute on War, Revolution, & Peace
30.9
Brookings Institution
30.2
Council on Foreign Relations
25.7
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
20.8
Center for Strategic and International Studies
16.9
American Enterprise Institute
16.3
Cato Institute
14.0
Russell Sage Foundation
14.0
Resources for the Future
12.0
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
7.7
Manhattan Institute
7.1
Hudson Institute
7.1
Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies
6.3
Institute for International Economics
5.7
Committee for Economic Development
4.4
National Center for Policy Analysis
5.2
Progressive Policy Institute
2.5

Source: IRS 990s for 2001.

  4:07:38 PM  permalink  

Transcript: David Kay at Senate hearing: Short, worth reading.  Highlights: "It turns out that we were all wrong, probably in my judgment, and that is most disturbing. We're also in a period in which we've had intelligence surprises in the proliferation area that go the other way. The case of Iran, a nuclear program that the Iranians admit was 18 years on, that we underestimated. And, in fact, we didn't discover it. It was discovered by a group of Iranian dissidents outside the country who pointed the international community at the location. The Libyan program recently discovered was far more extensive than was assessed prior to that.

There's a long record here of being wrong. There's a good reason for it, probably multiple reasons. Certainly proliferation is a hard thing to track, particularly in countries that deny easy and free access and don't have free and open societies. .. I  do believe we have to understand why reality turned out to be different than expectations and estimates. ..

I had innumerable analysts who came to me in apology that the world that we were finding was not the world that they had thought existed and that they had estimated. Reality on the ground differed in advance. And never -- not in a single case -- was the explanation, "I was pressured to do this." The explanation was very often, "The limited data we had led one to reasonably conclude this. I now see that there's another explanation for it." ..  I did not come across a single one that felt it had been, in the military term, "inappropriate command influence" that led them to take that position. ..

[Looting and] document destruction [in Iraq means] we're really not going to be able to prove beyond a truth the negatives and some of the positive conclusions that we're going to come to. There will be always unresolved ambiguity here. ..

In my judgment, based on the work that has been done to this point of the Iraq Survey Group, and in fact, that I reported to you in October, Iraq was in clear violation of the terms of [U.N.] Resolution 1441. .. We have discovered hundreds of cases, based on both documents, physical evidence and the testimony of Iraqis, of activities that were prohibited under the initial U.N. Resolution 687 and that should have been reported under 1441, with Iraqi testimony that not only did they not tell the U.N. about this, they were instructed not to do it and they hid material."

  10:43:05 AM  permalink  

 
January 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Dec   Feb
-
Subscribe to "Current events" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

jenett.radio.simplicity.1.3R


Copyright 2006 © Ken Novak.
Last update: 5/16/2006; 2:09:04 PM.